People who think south park is “problematic” are the reason south park exists

britisharmyofficial:

These are archive photos from the Battle of Arnhem, Netherlands in September 1944 during the Second World War. Copyright: Airborne Assault Museum, Duxford.

poppypicklesticks:

flufflogic:

wilwheaton:

konradwerks:

The situation is just intolerable. 
There have been a lot of really insightful write-ups recently. A broader perspective—and I almost cringe to say—catch-all by Molly Crabapple left me gasping for breath. This write up, by Elizabeth Sampat giving her thoughts on an industry that’s very dear to me, delivered the final blow and left me in tears.
It’s really rare that I create from a place of grief. It’s just not how I operate. But it’s largely what I have openly felt for the last few days, and reflecting on it, it’s been there for far longer.
This quote from Elizabeth’s piece— “We should have a war memorial for all of the women we have lost to this. We should lay flowers and grieve and see our reflections in stone.”— struck a very literal chord in me.
So yeah, here it is. A place just for me where I can light a candle and remember all of the wonderful people I probably will never get the chance to meet.  Folks that have been driven away by these horrible fucks that have the audacity to think they know what gaming and community is about.
en memoriam.

I have never, in my life, been ashamed to call myself a gamer. Until now. These misogynist little shitbags are a disgrace to our community.
All of us who care about gaming need to step up and save our community, while there is still something about it that’s worth saving.

I disagree: what we have ISN’T worth saving. Real names (with proof provided to service provider) for EVERY multiplayer gaming platform. XBL, PSN, Steam, Desura, Roblox, Minecraft… all of them.

A war memorial??!
YOu fucking pretentious, self-indulgent crybabies.   You wouldn’t know a war if your spoilt, pampered little asses got drafted.
Yeah you’ll never meet women actually involved in the industry because you can’t take five minutes to learn about the likes of Reiko Kodama, Terri Brosius or Soraya Saga because you are too busy wallowing in self pity over first world problems, and because the women mentioned don’t sit around being professional victims the way Anita and her drones do: they get out and get shit done.  
A war memorial?  You neurotic prima donnas wouldn’t last five minutes in any profession  that involves anything other then whining on the internet.

poppypicklesticks:

flufflogic:

wilwheaton:

konradwerks:

The situation is just intolerable.

There have been a lot of really insightful write-ups recently. A broader perspective—and I almost cringe to say—catch-all by Molly Crabapple left me gasping for breath. This write up, by Elizabeth Sampat giving her thoughts on an industry that’s very dear to me, delivered the final blow and left me in tears.

It’s really rare that I create from a place of grief. It’s just not how I operate. But it’s largely what I have openly felt for the last few days, and reflecting on it, it’s been there for far longer.

This quote from Elizabeth’s piece— “We should have a war memorial for all of the women we have lost to this. We should lay flowers and grieve and see our reflections in stone.”— struck a very literal chord in me.

So yeah, here it is. A place just for me where I can light a candle and remember all of the wonderful people I probably will never get the chance to meet.  Folks that have been driven away by these horrible fucks that have the audacity to think they know what gaming and community is about.

en memoriam.

I have never, in my life, been ashamed to call myself a gamer. Until now. These misogynist little shitbags are a disgrace to our community.

All of us who care about gaming need to step up and save our community, while there is still something about it that’s worth saving.

I disagree: what we have ISN’T worth saving. Real names (with proof provided to service provider) for EVERY multiplayer gaming platform. XBL, PSN, Steam, Desura, Roblox, Minecraft… all of them.

A war memorial??!

YOu fucking pretentious, self-indulgent crybabies.   You wouldn’t know a war if your spoilt, pampered little asses got drafted.

Yeah you’ll never meet women actually involved in the industry because you can’t take five minutes to learn about the likes of Reiko Kodama, Terri Brosius or Soraya Saga because you are too busy wallowing in self pity over first world problems, and because the women mentioned don’t sit around being professional victims the way Anita and her drones do: they get out and get shit done.  

A war memorial?  You neurotic prima donnas wouldn’t last five minutes in any profession  that involves anything other then whining on the internet.

(via der-prinz-aus-stahl)

irkengodofjustice:

realwhiteculture:

realwhiteculture:

We want you to make a stand. To get up from behind the computer screen and start being part of the fight back.

The word Liberal is interchangeable with coward. What do the two have in common? They are always scared – especially of those who dislike them. The only weapon…

Some sheets would be quite nice

Look at the british flavored white supremacist trash my dash recommended me today. The original white trash.

Why reblog then?

jurhfalastini:

i hate westerners so much

Its a mutual feeling

eros-dikaios:

kanirou:

fatfeistyandfashionable:

bathsabbath:

piscula:

skooth:

bhavatarini:

myblacksexuality:

poetofwar333:

#cleopatra with the nose knocked off. I wonder if people still think she was European like the movies betray…

I still think it’s one of the most desperate things whites have done to blacks and to black history. The disrespect is outrageous. They came to our country and mentally could not fathom how these black civilizations could be so great. They literally rode through our lands and shot the noses off of our statues. Why? So that the statues would no longer resemble the African people and they could LIE about the origins of Egypt and countless other civilizations. It was a widespread practice. It’s why statues of Pharaoh’s and their wives have no noses. It’s why the Sphinx has no nose. When I was in middle and high school, we were taught that the noses had fell off due to time and poor craftsmanship! They have literally tried to teach us that our ancestors were shitty builders of noses just to hide their malicious destruction of our heritage. European fears of African peoples had to come from somewhere. I want to know what part of the history is missing. There’s something that they don’t want to be told.

The shade is real

i was taught that the noses fell off as well and actually continued to believe this. in retrospect this makes no sense, considering greek/roman statues pretty much always have intact noses whereas egyptian ones are always conveniently missing theirs. thank you for pointing this out to me, i hadn’t even made that connection until now.

The bolded was me too and I am seriously embarrassed that I never even thought about how that could be false.

Damnnn. I hate myself for not realizing this.
    I hate myself even more, since I know the ancient Egyptians created their sculptural works with the idea of permanence in mind. They were literally built to last throughout the afterlife. Notice how the majority of their monumental sculpture is stone-bound, without any protruding elements or breakable appendages. That’s because many of these sculptures were intended to house the life-force (Ka) of those they portrayed. Of their favorite materials were basalt and diorite, both extremely hard stones that were incredibly difficult to carve. Meaning a nose just doesn’t “fall off” because of “poor craftsmanship,” you would literally have to take a hammer to it. Fuckers.

I’m embarrassed and ashamed to add myself to the list of people who where taught that the noses “fell off” as a child and never once stopped to think about how incongruous that was to everything I had been taught about the Egyptian civilizations and their propensity for lasting works of art.

This is so inaccurate. 
Noses are always the first thing to go on statues, they protrude from the rest of the sculpture and are unsupported. This is true of Greek and Roman statues as well. This is Sulla, Roman general, consul, dictator, reformer, and kind of important. This is also the best bust we have of him and the one you will find in just about any textbook. 

Also, can we pause to think about environment here? The Mediterranean is much more long-lasting-statue friendly than Egypt is. Differences in humidity, wind patterns, building materials, and especially sand storms have immense effect on how well statues and carvings are preserved. 
More importantly, statue defamation was a practice that goes far back into Egyptian history itself. As previously (and accurately) mentioned, many statues were believed to either contain, preserve, or safeguard a deceased’s spirit after death. Burial statues would be deliberately defaced as acts of revenge, intimidation, or political leverage in times of upheaval. Political rival wants to hit you where it hurts? Deface your family’s statues. New dynasty in charge? Deface every statue of the old blood so their spirits can never hurt you. 
An unfortunately perfect example involves Hatshepsut, Queen and Pharaoh of Egypt who was immensely successful and powerful. Upon the succession of Thutmose III, he eventually ordered that all public images of her be defaced, some merely having the facial features knocked off, or sometimes full-out erasure:
(“la la la, nothing to see here!” like damn)
This practice was continued by invading conquerers, particularly Muslims (as they simply had far greater and longer lasting control than anyone else) but also Christians if they were in the area. Defacing local rulers is pretty common practice by conquerers anywhere you go in the world, but the spiritual/emotional/mental affect it had on Egyptians would not have gone unnoticed, so it was a good tool to undermine popular morale. 
The legend of Napoleon’s forces shooting off the nose is pure fiction, easily debunked by multiple scholars’ accounts and artists’ renditions of the Sphinx from before Napoleon was even born showing the Sphinx without a nose. The Sphinx’s nose was deliberately removed, but evidence strongly supports this being a religiously motivated act, not racial. Muslim officials deliberately defaced the Sphinx (made extremely clear by the large chisel marks left on the Sphinx’s face) because they repeatedly found local Egyptians worshipping or making homage to it. This was of course unacceptable to their new rulers, so they destroyed the statue and therefore whatever life force the Egyptians believed was within it. 
By the time we fast forward far enough in time to get to white European imperialists, noses have been getting knocked off Egyptian statues for hundreds and thousands of years. Did these Europeans deface more statues? I’m sure some did, but probably cause they were racist dicks, not out of any great international organized scheme at historical revision (please, you really think they were thinking that far ahead? all they cared about was money at this point). Europeans crafted cultural perceptions of racial superiority by denying the existence of Black Kingdoms, not by writing home “yeah these African kingdoms are totally rad and totally white.” Their approach was definitely more “African kingdoms? What African kingdoms?” But this all deals more with subSaharan peoples, not Egyptians.
At the end of the day, Egyptian archaeology ends up with lots of noseless statues, brought about by a number of factors:
1. some fell to environment and deterioration (as do all statues in the world)2. some fell to political violence and social upheaval3. some fell to religious foreign conquerers4. and finally some fell to European invaders
But to claim that all statues were defaced at the same time by the same people for the same reasons is just grossly inaccurate and is deliberate misrepresentation of the facts to create hyperbole. Egypt has a long and vibrant and at times tragic (and at others inspiring!) history, with plenty of truth to inspire lots of debate and discussion, so please, don’t dilute all this with falsehoods. 
PS - I swear I thought we’d gotten past this by now, but Cleopatra was a Macedonian Greek, and was heir to a long line of Macedonian Greeks. The Ptolemaic Dynasty was established after Alexander the Great conquered Egypt and established one of his generals as ruler. They adopted some Egyptian customs (mainly sibling marriage of the ruling family), but were always staunchly Greek. Cleopatra is indeed interesting though, because while her predecessors as a practice didn’t even speak Egyptian, Cleopatra learned and frequently spoke Egyptian, and very closely associated herself with the goddess Isis. But cultural blending aside, she was Greek, and her successor Caesarion was half Roman ala Julius Caesar.

Hey above blogger, I love you for schooling these dumb-dumbs on history and archaeology. And yes, for the last frickin’ time, Cleopatra was a descendent of Ptolemy, one of Alexander’s generals, and thus a Macedonian.
EESH. 
And FWIW 19th century Europeans acted horrendously destructive against much of Greece and Rome’s own treasures (Lord Elgin, anybody) because archaeology was only a beginning science and also because many of the items they came across did not fit their pre-conceived notions of classical antiquity.

eros-dikaios:

kanirou:

fatfeistyandfashionable:

bathsabbath:

piscula:

skooth:

bhavatarini:

myblacksexuality:

poetofwar333:

#cleopatra with the nose knocked off. I wonder if people still think she was European like the movies betray…

I still think it’s one of the most desperate things whites have done to blacks and to black history. The disrespect is outrageous. They came to our country and mentally could not fathom how these black civilizations could be so great. They literally rode through our lands and shot the noses off of our statues. Why? So that the statues would no longer resemble the African people and they could LIE about the origins of Egypt and countless other civilizations. It was a widespread practice. It’s why statues of Pharaoh’s and their wives have no noses. It’s why the Sphinx has no nose. When I was in middle and high school, we were taught that the noses had fell off due to time and poor craftsmanship! They have literally tried to teach us that our ancestors were shitty builders of noses just to hide their malicious destruction of our heritage. European fears of African peoples had to come from somewhere. I want to know what part of the history is missing. There’s something that they don’t want to be told.

The shade is real

i was taught that the noses fell off as well and actually continued to believe this. in retrospect this makes no sense, considering greek/roman statues pretty much always have intact noses whereas egyptian ones are always conveniently missing theirs. thank you for pointing this out to me, i hadn’t even made that connection until now.

The bolded was me too and I am seriously embarrassed that I never even thought about how that could be false.

Damnnn. I hate myself for not realizing this.

    I hate myself even more, since I know the ancient Egyptians created their sculptural works with the idea of permanence in mind. They were literally built to last throughout the afterlife. Notice how the majority of their monumental sculpture is stone-bound, without any protruding elements or breakable appendages. That’s because many of these sculptures were intended to house the life-force (Ka) of those they portrayed. Of their favorite materials were basalt and diorite, both extremely hard stones that were incredibly difficult to carve. Meaning a nose just doesn’t “fall off” because of “poor craftsmanship,” you would literally have to take a hammer to it. Fuckers.

I’m embarrassed and ashamed to add myself to the list of people who where taught that the noses “fell off” as a child and never once stopped to think about how incongruous that was to everything I had been taught about the Egyptian civilizations and their propensity for lasting works of art.

This is so inaccurate. 

Noses are always the first thing to go on statues, they protrude from the rest of the sculpture and are unsupported. This is true of Greek and Roman statues as well. This is Sulla, Roman general, consul, dictator, reformer, and kind of important. This is also the best bust we have of him and the one you will find in just about any textbook. 

Also, can we pause to think about environment here? The Mediterranean is much more long-lasting-statue friendly than Egypt is. Differences in humidity, wind patterns, building materials, and especially sand storms have immense effect on how well statues and carvings are preserved. 

More importantly, statue defamation was a practice that goes far back into Egyptian history itself. As previously (and accurately) mentioned, many statues were believed to either contain, preserve, or safeguard a deceased’s spirit after death. Burial statues would be deliberately defaced as acts of revenge, intimidation, or political leverage in times of upheaval. Political rival wants to hit you where it hurts? Deface your family’s statues. New dynasty in charge? Deface every statue of the old blood so their spirits can never hurt you. 

An unfortunately perfect example involves Hatshepsut, Queen and Pharaoh of Egypt who was immensely successful and powerful. Upon the succession of Thutmose III, he eventually ordered that all public images of her be defaced, some merely having the facial features knocked off, or sometimes full-out erasure:


(“la la la, nothing to see here!” like damn)

This practice was continued by invading conquerers, particularly Muslims (as they simply had far greater and longer lasting control than anyone else) but also Christians if they were in the area. Defacing local rulers is pretty common practice by conquerers anywhere you go in the world, but the spiritual/emotional/mental affect it had on Egyptians would not have gone unnoticed, so it was a good tool to undermine popular morale. 

The legend of Napoleon’s forces shooting off the nose is pure fiction, easily debunked by multiple scholars’ accounts and artists’ renditions of the Sphinx from before Napoleon was even born showing the Sphinx without a nose. The Sphinx’s nose was deliberately removed, but evidence strongly supports this being a religiously motivated act, not racial. Muslim officials deliberately defaced the Sphinx (made extremely clear by the large chisel marks left on the Sphinx’s face) because they repeatedly found local Egyptians worshipping or making homage to it. This was of course unacceptable to their new rulers, so they destroyed the statue and therefore whatever life force the Egyptians believed was within it. 

By the time we fast forward far enough in time to get to white European imperialists, noses have been getting knocked off Egyptian statues for hundreds and thousands of years. Did these Europeans deface more statues? I’m sure some did, but probably cause they were racist dicks, not out of any great international organized scheme at historical revision (please, you really think they were thinking that far ahead? all they cared about was money at this point). Europeans crafted cultural perceptions of racial superiority by denying the existence of Black Kingdoms, not by writing home “yeah these African kingdoms are totally rad and totally white.” Their approach was definitely more “African kingdoms? What African kingdoms?” But this all deals more with subSaharan peoples, not Egyptians.

At the end of the day, Egyptian archaeology ends up with lots of noseless statues, brought about by a number of factors:

1. some fell to environment and deterioration (as do all statues in the world)
2. some fell to political violence and social upheaval
3. some fell to religious foreign conquerers
4. and finally some fell to European invaders

But to claim that all statues were defaced at the same time by the same people for the same reasons is just grossly inaccurate and is deliberate misrepresentation of the facts to create hyperbole. Egypt has a long and vibrant and at times tragic (and at others inspiring!) history, with plenty of truth to inspire lots of debate and discussion, so please, don’t dilute all this with falsehoods. 

PS - I swear I thought we’d gotten past this by now, but Cleopatra was a Macedonian Greek, and was heir to a long line of Macedonian Greeks. The Ptolemaic Dynasty was established after Alexander the Great conquered Egypt and established one of his generals as ruler. They adopted some Egyptian customs (mainly sibling marriage of the ruling family), but were always staunchly Greek. Cleopatra is indeed interesting though, because while her predecessors as a practice didn’t even speak Egyptian, Cleopatra learned and frequently spoke Egyptian, and very closely associated herself with the goddess Isis. But cultural blending aside, she was Greek, and her successor Caesarion was half Roman ala Julius Caesar.

Hey above blogger, I love you for schooling these dumb-dumbs on history and archaeology. And yes, for the last frickin’ time, Cleopatra was a descendent of Ptolemy, one of Alexander’s generals, and thus a Macedonian.

EESH. 

And FWIW 19th century Europeans acted horrendously destructive against much of Greece and Rome’s own treasures (Lord Elgin, anybody) because archaeology was only a beginning science and also because many of the items they came across did not fit their pre-conceived notions of classical antiquity.

(via der-prinz-aus-stahl)

walpurgishalle:

Old Germany

(via anarchosaur)

durkin62:

bbronut:

durkin62:

thespos:

durkin62:

thespos:

thespos:

Black people cannot oppress white people or be racist towards them. Get that into your head really deep…if you still don’t understand maybe these analogies will help:

LGBT: cannot oppress straight people
WOMEN: cannot oppress men
NON BELIEVERS OF CHRISTIANITY: cannot oppress…

Bitch, why are you here??? White guilt? Are you sure your people shouldn’t have an inch of guilt after killing a numerous amount of people and giving them shit in return?? Thats what racism is in the United States and even worse that’s what genocide is. You should hate your ancestors for what they did and what is happening now as an aftermath affect.

Pick a race, allow me to enlighten you to their history you ignorant prick. 

Hmmm where should I start…..the genocide of the native Americans or the enslavement and killing of the African Americans. You choose.

You’re fucking retarded, I asked for you pick a race of people dumbass. But since clearly you’re too fucking idiotic to answer a simple question I just do this one anyway. Lets take a look at genocide. Clearly all of them have been done by white people, in the history of ever. 

Mayans and Aztecs weren’t carving people’s hearts outs of their chests for the gods, they were doing it for white people.

The Mongols killing at least 30,000,000 people? Caused by white people.

Along with Mao and his death toll, also white.

Armenian genocide at the hands of the Turkish? Nope, at the hands of white people.

Japanese Empire raping, killing, and looting all over the Pacific? Caused by white people.

Native Americans being tribes of warrior societies who constantly fought each other? Not until white people came along

Iroquois tribes being imperialistic land grabbing machines of brutality? Nope, only white people can be imperialistic.

Yuan-Ming dynasty transition? White people.

Qing conquering of the Ming dynasty? White people.

Taiping Rebellion? White people.

An Lushan Rebellion? White people.

Congo wars? White people.

Somalian Civil War? White people.

Nigerian Civil War? White people

Rwanda? Caused by white people.

Nairobi Mall attack? White people.

Cambodian Genocide? White people

Benghali Genocide? White people.

Since you clearly have the mental capacities of fucking walnut, let me clarify, that was sarcasm. Those were all done by people who weren’t white. 

Lets not forget all the raping, slavery, torture, and murder that occurred while all these white people were carving out empires. 

Arab Empire:
Map of expansion of Caliphate.svg

Turkish Empire:


Mongol Empire:


Hunnic Empire:


Japanese Empire:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b3/Japanese_Empire_%28orthographic_projection%29.svg/200px-Japanese_Empire_%28orthographic_projection%29.svg.png

Persian Empire:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/67/The_Achaemenid_Empire_under_Darius_the_Great%21.jpg/320px-The_Achaemenid_Empire_under_Darius_the_Great%21.jpg

Lets not forget the times it happened to fucking Europeans.

About 1 millions European Christians were enslaved by Northern Africa. At around 1600-1700ad

The Moors invaded and colonized Europe in 711ad. This lasted about 800 years. 

The Muslims did it in 1783ad. 

Carthage invaded Europe Numerous times 

Genocide of whites.

Another white genocide.

And, hey speaking of genocides. There are some going on right now, as we fucking speak. (spoiler alert, it’s not white people committing them, it’s people killing white people.)

White genocide in south Africa. 

Rape Jihads

No go zones for non Muslims.

Raped and stoned to death for being white.

Destroy the white race.

Who’s country?

Have you never heard of fucking ISIS you twit?

And you wanna talk about slavery? OK, lets do that. (Don’t forget about all the Europeans enslaved I just posted about too.) Guess what group of people have used the most slave labor? Fucking Arabs. Guess who started the slave trade in Africa that you’re blaming on white people? Arabs. Wanna talk about the American slave trade specifically? OK. 

Prior to 1655 there were no legal slaves in the colonies, only indentured servants. All masters were required to free their servants after their time was up. Seven years was the limit that an indentured servant could be held. Upon their release they were granted 50 acres of land. This included any black person purchased from slave traders. Black people were also granted 50 acres upon their release.

Anthony Johnson was a black man from modern-day Angola. He was brought to the US to work on a tobacco farm in 1619. When Anthony was released he was legally recognized as a free man and ran a successful farm. In 1651 he held 250 acres and five black indentured servants. In 1654, it was time for Anthony to release John Casor, a black indentured servant.

Instead Anthony told Casor he was extending his time. Casor left and became employed by the free white man Robert Parker. Anthony Johnson sued Robert Parker in the Northampton Court in 1654. In 1655, the court ruled that Anthony Johnson could hold John Casor indefinitely. The court gave judicial sanction for blacks to own slave of their own race. Thus Casor became the first permanent slave and Johnson the first slave owner.

So wait, it was a black man who actually pushed to make slavery legal in America?

But I mean, it was like just one black guy though right? What, no? There were almost 4000 Black slave owners in America? 

And lets not forget the America was actually one of the first nations to abolish slavery. While we were fighting a war over it, the Muslim slave trade in Africa, and Africa’s use of slave labor was still going strong. And it was just that, a trade. Americans weren’t going to Africa kidnapping people, they were sold. Mostly for sugar and tobacco. Some of the African leaders actually were concerned as to why the trade with America and European nations halted. 

This is what lead to the belief that only Africans were enslaved, when in fact it was just that Africa was the only place selling its own people. Both in Europe and the middle east, selling people into slavery was illegal. That didn’t stop warring parties from taking people though mind you. So you’re blaming white people for a slave trade created by Arab nations, and fully endorsed by African leaders themselves. When white people were the first to end it while Muslims and Africans continued on with it.

What are some of the after effects of this? 

U.K.
Victims of racist attacks in Oldham: 62% White
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1316725/Police-fear-Asian-gangs-may-set-up-no-go-areas.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/1160552.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/1296007.stm

Victims wounded in racist attacks: 83.3% White 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6128466.stm

Victims murdered in racist attacks: 41.4% White.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2006/oct/22/ukcrime.race

Racist assault victims: 62.5% White
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/most-race-attack-victims-are-white-1069502.html

U.S.
Victims of racist attacks per capita:
9 in 10,000 Whites
9 in 10,000 Hispanics
7 in 10,000 Blacks
http://www.wnd.com/2006/02/34888/

Black people kill 2.32 as many white people as vice versa, despite being 1/5 the population size. Effectively meaning a black person is on average, 11.6 times as likely to kill a white person, as a white person is to kill a black person. 

A white person in America has a better chance of being victimized by a black person than vice versa for virtually every fucking crime despite being a 5 times larger demographic. Take rape for example. Know how many white people are raped or sexually assaulted by black people per year? Over 30,000 fucking thousand a year. Know how many white people rape or sexually assault a black person? Less than fucking 10. 

http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus0502.pdf

So yes, once again. Take your white guilt and shove it up your ass. A word of advice, you might have an easier time fitting it up there if you pull your head out of it first. 

I am not a christian, I’m an atheist.
So shit what I can collect on oppression points? Jeez that’s awesome. Alright I’d like to start enjoying my get out of jail free cards by insulting Islam…

Were there any words in there?

(via der-prinz-aus-stahl)

xbmoorex:

probablyridiculous:

xbmoorex:

probablyridiculous:

xbmoorex:

probablyridiculous:

heritage-and-tradition:

wellbehavedwomendomakehistory:

nowyoukno:

Source for more facts on your dash follow NowYouKno

Somehow they forgot to mention that in every history class I ever had.

They can’t teach it because then people will know that White people weren’t the only ones to own slaves and that Blacks weren’t the only people to be slaves. It goes against their whole “evil White oppressors” thing.

Y’all wanna go in on these white folk or do I have to do it?

Why don’t you “go in” on these white folk yourself? Or are you such a lazy little shit that you need other people to speak for you?

Lazy? Nah. I’m exhausted. I’m too young, too black, and too innocent to be safe in AmeriKKKa. No one speaks for me. I’m tired of having to defend my melanin. I’m tired of having to explain why I matter. White Supremacy has taught you and anyone who agrees with the above statement that just because there were white slaves, we’re all even. Because white people were enslaved, black people need to “get over it”.
BLACK PEOPLE ARENT PISSED OFF BC OF SLAVERY. WE ARE PISSED OFF BC OF MODERN DAY RACISM, WHITE SUPREMACY, AND THE FACT THAT WE ARE TARGETED, STILL.
But privilege is poison. So even as I tell you these things, with all the truth and authority of a person who has been victimized and disrespected for being too brown, you won’t understand what I’m saying. You probably won’t even try to. Which makes you the little shit.

>WHITE SUPREMACY
I’m aware of what jon stewart would have to say. I just don’t agree with him. White supremacy doesn’t exist. If it existed then we wouldn’t have affirmative action, forced integration, wide open borders and the constant vilification of the West (along with everything associated with it) occurring all throughout our society. If it existed then your views wouldn’t be welcomed in the highest levels of academia and the media as they are right now. If it truly existed then your views wouldn’t be affirmed and constantly repeated 24/7 in our society for your own leisure. Try again.

If white supremacy didn’t exist we wouldn’t desperately need affirmative action or FORCED integration, because POC would be thought of as PEOPLE FIRST. If white supremacy didn’t exist, my views on institutionalized racism wouldn’t have to be constantly repeated. If it didn’t exist, you would not have felt the need to cross out my argument, which is another way of muting my voice…because PEOPLE are complex and PEOPLE have experiences in life that differ which, at times, result in opinions that don’t always line up, but everyone deserves to be heard nevertheless… But privilege is poison. So even as I tell you these things, with all the truth and authority of a person who has been victimized and disrespected for being too brown, you won’t understand what I’m saying. 
You probably won’t even try to.
And the cycle continues.

The concept of white supremacy implies that we live in a society that is run by whites who exert power strictly for the purpose of:
a) protecting the interests of whites (all whites) at the expense of non-whites or..
b) for the purpose of facilitating the supremacy of whites (all whites) over non-whites.
None of this is true at all. I’ve already listed just a few reasons for why this isn’t true and you still haven’t given me any reason to believe that it is true. Conceding that our government enforces policies that contradict your assertion that white supremacy exists doesn’t prove the existence of white supremacy as you continue to claim. It actually proves that it doesn’t exist at all which has been my point all along.
I’m curious as to why blacks (who you conveniently lump together with all non-whites by using the the term POC) need open borders and mass immigration in this country though. You forgot to explain that.
Me crossing out your argument (if you wanna call it that) doesn’t count as evidence for the existence of white supremacy either. I crossed out your response because I don’t want to bore anyone with the same unsubstantiated dribble that we’ve all heard before and continue to hear ad nauseam.

xbmoorex:

probablyridiculous:

xbmoorex:

probablyridiculous:

xbmoorex:

probablyridiculous:

heritage-and-tradition:

wellbehavedwomendomakehistory:

nowyoukno:

Source for more facts on your dash follow NowYouKno

Somehow they forgot to mention that in every history class I ever had.

They can’t teach it because then people will know that White people weren’t the only ones to own slaves and that Blacks weren’t the only people to be slaves. It goes against their whole “evil White oppressors” thing.

Y’all wanna go in on these white folk or do I have to do it?

Why don’t you “go in” on these white folk yourself? Or are you such a lazy little shit that you need other people to speak for you?

Lazy? Nah. I’m exhausted. I’m too young, too black, and too innocent to be safe in AmeriKKKa. No one speaks for me. I’m tired of having to defend my melanin. I’m tired of having to explain why I matter.
White Supremacy has taught you and anyone who agrees with the above statement that just because there were white slaves, we’re all even. Because white people were enslaved, black people need to “get over it”.

BLACK PEOPLE ARENT PISSED OFF BC OF SLAVERY. WE ARE PISSED OFF BC OF MODERN DAY RACISM, WHITE SUPREMACY, AND THE FACT THAT WE ARE TARGETED, STILL.


But privilege is poison. So even as I tell you these things, with all the truth and authority of a person who has been victimized and disrespected for being too brown, you won’t understand what I’m saying.
You probably won’t even try to.
Which makes you the little shit.

>WHITE SUPREMACY

I’m aware of what jon stewart would have to say. I just don’t agree with him. White supremacy doesn’t exist. If it existed then we wouldn’t have affirmative action, forced integration, wide open borders and the constant vilification of the West (along with everything associated with it) occurring all throughout our society. If it existed then your views wouldn’t be welcomed in the highest levels of academia and the media as they are right now. If it truly existed then your views wouldn’t be affirmed and constantly repeated 24/7 in our society for your own leisure. Try again.

If white supremacy didn’t exist we wouldn’t desperately need affirmative action or FORCED integration, because POC would be thought of as PEOPLE FIRST.
If white supremacy didn’t exist, my views on institutionalized racism wouldn’t have to be constantly repeated.
If it didn’t exist, you would not have felt the need to cross out my argument, which is another way of muting my voice…because PEOPLE are complex and PEOPLE have experiences in life that differ which, at times, result in opinions that don’t always line up, but everyone deserves to be heard nevertheless…

But privilege is poison. So even as I tell you these things, with all the truth and authority of a person who has been victimized and disrespected for being too brown, you won’t understand what I’m saying. 
You probably won’t even try to.

And the cycle continues.

The concept of white supremacy implies that we live in a society that is run by whites who exert power strictly for the purpose of:

a) protecting the interests of whites (all whites) at the expense of non-whites or..

b) for the purpose of facilitating the supremacy of whites (all whites) over non-whites.

None of this is true at all. I’ve already listed just a few reasons for why this isn’t true and you still haven’t given me any reason to believe that it is true. Conceding that our government enforces policies that contradict your assertion that white supremacy exists doesn’t prove the existence of white supremacy as you continue to claim. It actually proves that it doesn’t exist at all which has been my point all along.

I’m curious as to why blacks (who you conveniently lump together with all non-whites by using the the term POC) need open borders and mass immigration in this country though. You forgot to explain that.

Me crossing out your argument (if you wanna call it that) doesn’t count as evidence for the existence of white supremacy either. I crossed out your response because I don’t want to bore anyone with the same unsubstantiated dribble that we’ve all heard before and continue to hear ad nauseam.

(via der-prinz-aus-stahl)

poppypicklesticks:

onlyblackgirl:

The history of film in one scene

"This film is looking a little too Japanese."

"It’s set in Heian era Japan."

"So what are you trying to say?"

"That black people haven’t been invented yet?"

"This film is looking a little too white."

"It’s set in prehistoric France during the time of the Cro-Magnons."

"So what are you trying to say?"

"That black people haven’t been invented yet?"

"This film is looking a little too Latin."

"It’s set in Tenochtitlan."

"So what are you trying to say?"

"That black people haven’t been invented yet?"

"This film is looking a little too Indian."

"It’s set in 8th century Varinasi."

"So what are you trying to say?"

"That black people haven’t been invented yet?"

"This film is looking a little too Chinese."

"It’s set in Qing dynasty China."

"So what are you trying to say?"

"That black people haven’t been invented yet?"

(Source: frankoceanvevo, via der-prinz-aus-stahl)